Skip to main content
Chapter 7

Attribution Without Hierarchy

DID, Open Badges 3.0 and the end of the ranking system applied to science

“Attest without ranking. Recognize without hierarchizing. It is technically difficult, and that is precisely the project's gamble.”

Narrative

The problem with classical gamification

When we hear “gamification”, we think of Duolingo: streaks, XP, leaderboards, and colorful collectible badges. This grammar has two flaws that make it toxic for science.

First, it ranks. A leaderboard assumes a single metric exists to order contributors. In science, this does not exist. The researcher who proposes a bold hypothesis, the one who cleanly falsifies it, the one who curates broken links in the database—their three contributions are not of the same type, let alone the same value on a common scale.

Second, it distracts. The Duolingo streak brings you back daily not because you want to learn Spanish, but because you fear losing your streak. This is a hijacking of the dopaminergic circuit—effective in the short term, detrimental to long-term motivation quality. Science needs intrinsic motivation, not Skinnerian loops.

Bactaegion tries to find a third way: recognize without ranking, attribute without hierarchy.

Open Badges 3.0 — the technical piece

The W3C Verifiable Credentials standard, in its Open Badges 3.0 version (IMS Global, 2023), provides the primitive. A badge is a cryptographically verifiable attestation. It is issued by an identified issuer, regarding an identified subject, with a description of what is attested.

Three properties make it a unique tool for our context:

  1. Soulbound: the badge is linked to the recipient’s identity. It cannot be transferred or sold. It has no market value. It is an attestation, not an asset.

  2. Offline verifiable: the issuer’s cryptographic signature can be verified by anyone, without relying on a central platform. If Bactaegion disappears tomorrow, your badges remain verifiable by any public key holder.

  3. Bridgeable to ORCID, ResearchGate, personal sites. Open Badges 3.0 exposes a JSON-LD format that academic profiles can display. A Schlafen Annotator badge can appear on your ORCID page just like a publication.

Bactaegion issues badges for documented actions: having annotated 50 sequences, having corrected 20 low-confidence alignments, having proposed a lead that passed 5 peer verdicts with an approved verdict, having submitted 10 accepted wiki corrections. It is descriptive. Not a rank. Not an aggregated score. A factual description of what you have done.

DID — the identity you control

For an assigned badge to remain linked to you, you need an identifier that does not depend on a centralized account. The W3C Decentralized Identifiers (DID) specification offers this. It is a cryptographic identifier generated on your device, never transmitted in its entirety, whose possession you prove by signature.

The Bactaegion implementation uses WebAuthn as the key source. This is the same primitive that secures your biometric logins on Google or Apple. Your private key stays in your device’s secure enclave, never exported. To sign a lead or receive a badge, you touch your fingerprint reader or Touch ID—just like logging into your bank.

It is technically more rigorous than most scientific platforms (which ask for a password and send a session cookie). Philosophically, it is the exact opposite of a centralized account: you are your own identity server.

The trap avoided: NFTs and pseudo-decentralization

We must be direct about what we do not do. No tokens, no blockchain, no NFTs. Open Badges 3.0 badges are signed JSON objects, not assets on a distributed ledger. The DID is stored on your device, not on Ethereum.

The reason is doctrinal. Bactaegion is a TAZ project: we minimize external dependencies. A blockchain is a massive external dependency, energy-intensive, and—above all—it introduces an economic metric exactly where we seek to avoid it. If your badges have a market price, then mechanically, the most visible contributors become the most “valued”. We rebuild the exact ranking we sought to abolish.

Open Badges 3.0 + DID + WebAuthn provides all the expected verification and portability properties, without the speculative economy. This is deliberate.

The work of gnomes

The Gemini engagement report insisted on an often-overlooked point. In Wikipedia, as in any living digital commons, the bulk of the work is invisible. Correcting broken links, harmonizing naming conventions, monitoring suspicious edits: this is what the sociology of Wikipedia calls the work of gnomes.

Gnomes are structurally disadvantaged by all narrative metrics. They do not propose bold leads. They do not publish chapters. They do not receive praise. Yet, without them, the commons silently degrades until it becomes unusable.

Bactaegion therefore explicitly awards Gnome badges—Accession Gnome (corrected X UniProt errors), Consistency Gnome (harmonized Y terminological conventions), Watch Gnome (reported Z annotation anomalies). And the governance documentation specifies that these contributions count as much as narrative contributions in any collective decision regarding the project.

It is a political decision inscribed in the technical grammar of the attribution system. Not a slogan in a README.

To go further

All chapters Annotate a protein now Read the leads